Treatment Failure
INTRODUCTION
Appropriate antidepressant therapy on average results in symptomatic improvement
in up to 70 percent of compliant patients. In a considerable portion of initial
non-responders, a variety of strategies will eventually lead to resolution of
symptoms as well.
These strategies include:
- Optimization of initial drug therapy
- Augmentation of one anti-depressant drug with a second,
non-antidepressant agent
- Substitution of one antidepressant drug with another anti-depressant
drug
- The combination of two antidepressant drugs
Each of these strategies has a place in the
treatment of depression which does
not respond to an appropriate antidepressant regimen. By systematically
considering each of the various strategies for individual patients, general
practitioners should be better able to match individual patients with the best
alternative, and improve the likelihood of a successful therapeutic outcome.
Optimization of antidepressant drug therapy is not a trivial strategy as it
requires an understanding of the antidepressant being used, as well as
individual patient response. The definition of adequate dosage depends on
which
antidepressant drug is chosen. Moreover, if an effort to optimize therapy is not
made, treatment is not likely to be successful. In essence, there are four
aspects to optimization. The first is to make sure that patients are given
adequate doses of the selected antidepressant agent.
The second is that treatment must continue for a long enough period of time to
achieve a complete antidepressant effect.
However, in general, it is important to keep in mind that some patients may not
tolerate recommended dosages, at least initially. For these individuals -
unfortunately not yet identifiable - it may be necessary to introduce the agent
more slowly, and escalate the dose gradually over a period of several weeks to
improve both intolerance and compliance.
Lower than recommended dosing is particularly important in the elderly, in whom
approximately 50 percent of the recommended starting dose is reasonable on
initiation of therapy. Although attempts should be made to increase to standard
doses, some patients may also remain on lower than recommended dosage for the
remainder of the treatment regimen.
Lower than recommended initial doses should also be used when introducing
antidepressant therapy in young patients; patients with concurrent medical
problems, especially when hepatic, cardiac or neurologic in nature, and those on
concomitant medication such as digoxin and coumadin. Clinicians may safely begin
to titrate starting doses up to, if necessary, the maximum recommended dosage
for that particular antidepressant agent after an appropriate interlude,
depending on the half-life of the drug.
In terms of an adequate therapeutic trial, literature reports confirm that
patients require a minimum of five to eight weeks of treatment before any
antidepressant agent achieves an appreciable therapeutic effect. This is
independent of the half-life of the agent used; at present, there is no evidence
that antidepressants with a longer half-life take longer to have an
antidepressant effect than those with a shorter half-life, although clearly a
longer half-life permits less frequent dosing.
It is, of course, a truism that clinicians can't expect patients to improve if
they fail to take their medication. Importantly, studies of compliance in
different patient populations suggest that as many as one-third of patients
receiving antidepressant medication are not going to take enough of the
medication to have any appreciable therapeutic effect; another third will be
"hit and miss" with their dosing, with only one-third of the treatment
population taking the regimen more or less as prescribed.
Third, to ensure better patient compliance, optimization thus should also
include monitoring of blood levels where possible. Currently, blood levels are
available for the
tricyclic (plasma/tricyclic level) antidepressants (TCAs) such
that clinicians may verify that a patient has achieved therapeutic blood levels.
(This is particularly useful for nortriptyline which has a narrow "therapeutic
window", above which response rates decline).
In certain research settings, blood levels are also available for the
SSRIs;
however, they are not useful in helping assess the therapeutic effects of an
SSRI. Similarly, while percentage inhibition is associated with response in the
setting of the
MAOIs, it is a complicated equation, and blood levels do not
directly reflect the therapeutic response to a MAOI either. If patients still do
not respond adequately to medication and remain symptomatic after an adequate
therapeutic trial of 6 to 8 weeks, consideration should be given to one of the
remaining strategies for improved antidepressant response, namely, substitution,
augmentation or combination antidepressant therapy.
Last, with optimization of therapy, it is important to remember that certain
subtypes of depression, notably seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and atypical
depression may be more responsive to specific antidepressant therapy: Hence,
specificity of the antidepressant used is a factor in optimization as well. For
example, certain types of anxious depression appear to respond less well to the TCAs, and better to either the SSRIs or the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs);
co-morbid social phobia similarly may be more responsive to the SSRIs and the
MAOIs than other classes of antidepressant medication.
In contrast to somewhat outdated notions, agitated and retarded depression do
not require different antidepressant drugs: each respond equally well to the
same antidepressant therapy, regardless of the specific symptom complex.
Likewise, no difference has been shown in treatment response in patients whose
depression is associated with a precipitant versus depression without an
associated precipitant. Finally, atypical depression, defined by less frequent
constellation of increased appetite and weight, along with increased sleep,
responds better to the MAOIs and the SSRIs than to TCAs.
Summary of Optimization
Optimization is the first strategy to be used when patients do not achieve a
satisfactory antidepressant response to initial treatment. This consists of:
- Ensuring the dose used is adequate (either adequately high or adequately
low)
- Ensuring the treatment course has been long enough for the
antidepressant to take effect
- Ensuring patients achieve therapeutic blood levels, where appropriate
- Ensuring the antidepressant chosen is as specific as possible for the
type of depression being treated
If all four elements have been adequately addressed, and response is still
unsatisfactory, other strategies should be initiated until such time as patients
do achieve a therapeutic response.
continue : antidepressant
augmentation
This paper was developed and written by Dr. Russell Joffe, Dr. Anthony
Levitt, Dr. Stephen Sokolov, and Dr. L. Trevor Young while they were on staff at
the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural
Neurosciences, McMaster University.The paper was supported by an educational
grant from Eli Lilly Canada Inc.
top .
pages 1 2
3
4 .
send to friend .
depression site map
Reviewed: 02/2006
|
|