|
cont. from
Case studies show that
traumatic events in which there is pressure towards
secrecy are more likely to induce
forgetting as a dissociative defense. For
example, a woman who is brutally attacked by a stranger but who receives
sympathy, family support, and many opportunities to tell her story, may suffer
from
PTSD, but is unlikely to develop
amnesia for the event. However, a young
girl who endures repeated incest with her father and has been sworn to secrecy
will more likely have memory impairment for the abuse.
Factors Influencing
Continuous Memory |
Factors Influencing
Dissociation/Amnesia |
| Single traumatic event |
Multi-event (repetitive) |
| Natural or accidental cause |
Deliberate human cause |
| Adult victim |
Child victim |
| Validation and support |
Denial and secrecy |
Clinical evidence indicates that the population most likely to develop
amnesia for traumatic experiences consists of child victims coerced into silence
about repetitive, deliberately caused trauma such as incest or extra-familial
physical, emotional, or sexual abuse. Another factor that contributes to memory
disturbances is the double-bind felt by children trying to make sense of living
in abusive relationships on which they depend for nurturance. Doctors or
therapists can have an indication of dissociative amnesia if there are gaps or
blank periods in a person's autobiographical memories.
What is known about how memories work?
Human memory is a complex operation. Although there is still much to learn
about how memories work, scientists generally understand and accept that there
are four stages of memory: intake, storage (encoding), rehearsal, and retrieval.
Each of these processes can be influenced by many factors such as developmental
stage, setting, expectation, post-event questioning, etc. Even the conditions at
the time of the telling of a memory can change the form of the memory,
influencing its content and belief in the truth of the memory in the future.
Most scientists also agree that there are two identified forms of memory:
explicit and implicit. Explicit memory, also called declarative or narrative
memory, is the ability to consciously recall facts or events. This is the form
of memory used, for example, when a person recounts the events of his or her day
at work or school. Implicit memory, also called procedural or sensorimotor
memory, refers to behavioral knowledge of an experience without conscious
recall. A person who demonstrates proficiency at reading but who cannot remember
how he or she learned the skill is an example of implicit memories in the
absence of explicit memories.
Why are traumatic memories controversial?
There are differing schools of thought, grounded in solid research and
clinical experience, about the reliability of memory. The details of this
scientific debate are often obscure, and the subtleties can be confusing to the
public.
Some researchers have proven in the laboratory that ordinary or slightly
stressful memories are easily distorted. These scientists are concerned that
therapists may be unintentionally distorting the memories of people who report
histories of traumatic abuse. This is of particular concern to scientists
studying the effects of hypnosis on eyewitness testimony because there is
laboratory evidence that setting and expectation can "contaminate" a person's
memories.
However, this laboratory research on ordinary memory may be irrelevant in
regard to memories of traumatic experiences. Scientists argue that traumatic
memories are different from ordinary clinical memories in the way they are
encoded on the brain. There is evidence that trauma is stored in the part of the
brain called the limbic system, which processes emotions and sensations, but not
language or speech. For this reason, people who have been traumatized may live
with implicit memories of the terror, anger, and sadness generated by the
trauma, but with few or no explicit memories to explain the feelings. Trauma
clinicians believe that implicit memories are not easily distorted. It would, of
course be unethical to create in a laboratory setting the traumatic experiences
necessary to study traumatic memories and their ease of contamination or
distortion. For this reason, our knowledge of traumatic memories must come from
clinical experience. Clinical data since 1919 has shown a direct correlation
between trauma and amnesia or other memory disturbance (Van der Kolk, 1994).
What about memory retrieval long after the trauma?
Sometimes a current event or experience may trigger long-forgotten memories
of earlier trauma. Often when this happens, the person may be "flooded" with
implicit sensorimotor memory: he or she may have just the picture, the feeling,
the physiological
panic aroused by the memory of the traumatic event without the
facts that would explain the meaning of the sensations. Initially, the person
may not even be aware of what has triggered the memory, or how the pictures and
feelings relate to his or her life.
There is often intense psychological distress when a person is exposed to
events which in some way resemble or symbolize the past trauma. These "triggers"
may be any sound, smell, or other stimulus such as hot, humid weather which may
remind a veteran of his service in southeast Asia, or the smell of a particular
cologne which was worn by an abuser.
continue: Should You Believe Your Traumatic Memories?
top .
pages 1
2
3 .
send to friend .
dissociative disorders site map
Reviewed: 04/2006
|
REALMENTALHEALTH CARE PROVIDER DIRECTORY
Find a Local Therapist
|
|