Psychiatric Drugs, Pregnancy and Lactation: Alternative Treatments for Psychiatric
Disorders
September 1, 2002 from
ObGynNews
By Lee S. Cohen, M.D.
A common scenario seen on our consultation service is a woman with an
anxiety
or mood disorder who is stabilized on a drug and who wants to switch to an
alternative medicine during pregnancy or while trying to conceive. The compounds
people ask the most about are
St. John's wort,
SAMe (S-adenosyl-L-methionine),
and omega-3 fatty acids. We also get questions about the use of
kava supplements
as an alternative treatment for anxiety.
Many women make the intuitive leap that some of these widely used
complementary or alternative therapies represent a more "natural" and therefore
safer alternative to a more standard pharmacologic treatment during pregnancy or
while they are trying to conceive. The problem is that we have very little, if
any, reproductive safety data on these natural compounds. Many of these products
do not contain just the specific herbal compound, but fillers and other
components used for compounding, about which we know very little.
Moreover, efficacy data for many of the herbals are limited. For example,
there is still an ongoing debate about the efficacy of St. John's wort for
depression. Although there are no data indicating that it's dangerous, not much
is known about the reproductive safety of hypericum, its active ingredient.
While omega-3 fatty acids are not presumed to be teratogenic, the data
supporting their efficacy in patients with bipolar disorder have been based
primarily on adjunctive use with other mood-stabilizing medications. There are
very little data on monotherapy; even the experience with adjunctive therapy was
based on an extremely small sample of people.
Based on these uncertainties, an arbitrary switch to an alternative treatment
may represent a failed risk-benefit decision, exposing a pregnant woman to both
an unknown reproductive safety risk and an increased risk for relapse. A woman
therefore will not be in a much better position regarding safety with one of
these products than with a drug for which there are only limited reproductive
safety data but which is known to be effective.
The growing array of newer antidepressants and anticonvulsants increases the
possibility that more women will be successfully treated, although not much is
yet known about their reproductive safety. More is known about the older
medications, like lithium and divalproex sodium (Depakote), which are known to
be teratogenic.
Some
antidepressants, including fluoxetine (Prozac) and the tricyclics, are
not teratogenic. There are neurobehavioral data following children through age 7
years showing no adverse impact of in utero exposure to these agents, but there
is still more to be learned about their long-term neurobehavioral effects.
My biggest concern is the risk of relapse in women who switch to an
alternative treatment under the presumption that it will invariably work. What
has become increasingly clear, however, is that across psychiatric disorders
pregnancy is not protective against relapses or onset of new illness, so more
patients are being treated with pharmacologic therapies.
A common scenario we see is a woman who has had multiple episodes of major
depression and has been treated with multiple antidepressants. She has been
stabilized on a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor like fluoxetine, for
which there is a lot of reproductive safety information, or a medicine like
mirtazapine, nefazodone, or bupropion, for which we have very little
reproductive safety information. This is the type of patient who is at high risk
of relapse if she stops taking medication, and many of these patients do
relapse.
An untreated mood disorder during pregnancy is not something to discount.
There is a growing literature illustrating the impact of untreated depression
during pregnancy, including adverse outcomes on perinatal well-being in terms of
Apgar scores, birth weight, and other basic neonatal outcomes. The most dramatic
example is with bipolar patients who, without proper treatment, may relapse into
severe recurrent mania or depression, placing the fetus and mother at increased
risk.
As a clinician and a researcher, I appreciate the efforts to identify safe
treatments during pregnancy. Unfortunately, the science to support the belief
that natural treatments are safer, held by so many women (and some clinicians)
who are concerned about prenatal exposure to any psychiatric medicines, is not
substantiated.
While we have pregnancy registries for some psychiatric medications and there
are animal data on these medications, we may never have such reproductive safety
data on some of the naturally occurring compounds, because to date they remain
unregulated.
Dr. Lee Cohen is a psychiatrist and director of the
perinatal psychiatry program at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. He is a
consultant for and has received research support from manufacturers of several
SSRIs. He is also a consultant to Astra Zeneca, Lilly and Jannsen -
manufacturers of atypical antipsychotics.
continue: Update on Bipolar
Disorder . drugs during pregnancy index
top .
pages 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 13
14
15
16
17
18 .
send to friend .
mental health site
map
Reviewed: 03/2006
|
REALMENTALHEALTH CARE PROVIDER DIRECTORY
Find a Local Therapist
|
|