Psychiatric Drugs, Pregnancy and Lactation: Fluoxetine (Prozac) Report Lacks Context
June 15, 2004 from
ObGynNews
By Lee S. Cohen, M.D.
In April, the National Toxicology Program's Center for the Evaluation of
Risks to Human Reproduction, established by the NTP and the National Institute
of Environmental Health Sciences, issued a final report on the reproductive and
developmental toxicity of fluoxetine (Prozac). The report concluded that "third-trimester
exposure to therapeutic doses of fluoxetine ... is associated with an increased
incidence of poor neonatal adaptation," which includes jitteriness, tachypnea,
poor tone, and other symptoms, "as well as increased admissions to special care
nurseries."
Having reviewed the report in draft and final form and having testified at
the meeting of the expert panel convened to write the report, my greatest
concern is what patients and some clinicians may do with the panel's
conclusions. Information in the report, while comprehensive and technically
correct in most cases, might easily be misconstrued by women and their families.
The report provides a summary and review of existing data, with a thorough
review of the animal and human literature on reproductive safety of fluoxetine.
It does not adequately address the clinical context in which fluoxetine or other
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used. While this may not be
the aim of the project, failure to address this issue limits the report's value
with respect to its ability to inform clinical care; the absence of a clinical
context with which to interpret the report may lead to incorrect conclusions and
clinical treatment decisions, putting women at risk for the sequelae of
untreated or relapsing depressive illness.
The report criticizes much of the literature regarding reproductive safety of
fluoxetine, which is understandable because controlled studies of exposures to
any medication during pregnancy are not done for ethical reasons. Conclusions
regarding reproductive safety of medications come from various sources, such as
case series, postmarketing surveillance registries, and teratovigilance
programs. These sources can sometimes provide large enough numbers of drug
exposures to allow for useful conclusions regarding reproductive safety.
The panel's conclusions regarding the risk for major congenital malformations
associated with prenatal exposure to fluoxetine are consistent with the
literature and suggest an absence of increased risk with first-trimester
exposure to the medicine. The report also addresses the risk for "perinatal
toxicity," which typically includes symptoms of jitteriness and autonomic
reactivity in the newborn.
Enough literature has accumulated suggesting that third-trimester
exposure to SSRIs may be tied to an increased risk of transient symptoms as noted above.
Most reports have not associated such exposure with adverse longer-term sequelae.
Fluoxetine is the only SSRI for which we have long-term neurobehavioral data,
including follow-up of exposed children through ages 4-7 years. No differences
in long-term neurobehavioral outcome between exposed and unexposed children
were noted.
One of the greatest failures of the NTP report is that an important
confounding factor with regard to outcome of SSRI use in pregnancy is neglected:
maternal mood. In the recent literature, one can find the same "toxicity," such
as lower Apgar scores or obstetric complications, in children of mothers who
have untreated depression during pregnancy. Failure to address this adequately
in the report is a significant omission.
Fluoxetine is used to treat a serious illness; it is not a potential
environmental toxin, such as those reviewed by other NTP panels. The report does
not indicate that decisions about whether to use fluoxetine during pregnancy are
clinical choices made by patients in the context of some risk-benefit analysis
made collaboratively between the patient, her family, and the physician. My
colleagues and I have described high rates of relapse in women with a history of
recurrent major depression who discontinue antidepressants in pregnancy.
Depression during pregnancy is associated with compromised fetal and neonatal
outcomes-risks that are not reflected in the report. Discontinuation of
medication near the end of pregnancy appears to increase the risk for postpartum
depression.
The panel notes in the report that it recognizes that any risks of fluoxetine
need to be weighed against the risks of untreated disease. But this brief
statement embedded in a lengthy document that describes fluoxetine as "a
reproductive toxin" is inadequate. One has to wonder how this report will impact
what actually goes on as patients make decisions about using these compounds.
Dr. Lee Cohen is a psychiatrist and director of the
perinatal psychiatry program at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. He is a
consultant for and has received research support from manufacturers of several
SSRIs. He is also a consultant to Astra Zeneca, Lilly and Jannsen -
manufacturers of atypical antipsychotics.
continue: Impact of SSRIs
on Unborn Child . drugs during pregnancy
index
top .
pages 1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 .
send to friend .
mental health site
map
Reviewed: 03/2006
|
REALMENTALHEALTH CARE PROVIDER DIRECTORY
Find a Local Therapist
|
|